City, politic, critic (english)

  1. Lexine dit :

    All things considered, this is a first class post

  2. lungren fatty dit :

    how clear and worth it having to say that contemporary art is already a massive school-kid-disaster, and it continues, and it continues…

    Beyond happenings with funny forms and uses in the vernissages (conceptual art is just show time, pop politic and weird humor), we have space to re-invent something new, wich has nothing to do with art itself. But that… that… that is a fucking secret.

  3. auddie dit :

    I don’t like the straights horizons, because with a straight horizon, you always look for the mistake, the unbalance, but when it’s sloped, there is then a dialog between other elements, and we have a cross, not just a line. I also like the lens default

  4. blm / new media / new age dit :

    New media age says : ” visualise your success”, “accept your success”, “separate your fear from your emotion”, “explore your emotion and go deep into it, even it hurts “, “the reality is an hologram”…

    I propose an other way to survive: Finding new jobs, moving in other countries, meeting new people, trying, trying, trying.

    Because, this new age stuff about success, emotion, fears, propagates secretely the “obligation of happyness” that rises up since decades in the US. It’s pure bullshit, because it avoids the real built-in architecture of the human brain, based on language. Separating the emotion from your fear, is a language mistake, not a solution.
    The words, here, accentuate your fear (or your love, or anything else). Acceptance, lalala new age media, exhibitionism, sado masochism, meditation (that doesn’t erase fascism or ultra capitalism, rejection of the differencies), culpability (if no money success), all these concepts are there to separate your freedom from your acts, from your moves. It’s pueril, and it’s dangerous.
    It’s tipically stuff related by people who are disturbed, who believe in magic, or by people who do’nt want to see how the reality is. People who live in L.A., for instance, who accepts the deshumanisation of the society, and who thinks that they are (inside) probaly wrong, but they’re not! They are just realistic and they don’t accept it. They prefer to adapt to the shit, rather than fighting against it.

  5. blm / new media / new age dit :

    and suddenly, the nice “digital artist from the internet” reveals himself after some pretty strange moves, that he’s a man obssesed by his online self-image, a man that doen’t stand any argumentation. He’s still sure about his great open-minded theory about alternative art, the sytem, how artists should be and act, and so on… and so on …
    this open minded tech scene guy, was an other right wing psychopath disguised in cool dude outfits, who doesn’t fear to send you the bill in the minute, or a fb block if you’re a little too fast to discover the fakeness

  6. vatican cops.. dit :

    Subject : Recently (july 17) Cardinals and Vatican High society Priest get busted, doing drug and gay orgy ; in the holy place !
    I don’t see any problems with gay and drug orgies. This joyfull expériences are naturals. The problem is, of course, that they forbid them since 2017 years. They kill. They burn. the separe // and since a very long time.
    They use texts, dogmas and moral for their busnesses and dictatorials cultural hardcore hidden shit politics. Because religion is just politic… It has always been like this. Other religions too. And you can observe how ISIS ist just organising their little capitalists standarts based on sex and slavery.
    It’s not only catholics. It’s jewishs and muslims and buddhists. All corrupts. All liars.
    So, … why should we be shocked ? Which opinion should we have ? Do we say : oh, it’s horrible, orgies in the vatican?
    A complicated duality (tropism) without clear ennemies, clear justice, clear moral, tends to emerge. As it emerges for many other subjects. And the crowd still take part of the game. choose your enemy… Choose your side.
    Wich side? :-)

  7. auddie dit :

    Las vegas Massacre.

    It’s about the ugly “normality” of nowadays. And they search for an anomaly in the killer, somthing hidden .But. Nothing is no longer hidden in this clountry ! In this abnormal society full or weakness, lies and disparities. A real fucked up world.

    End of the european holly-days in america

  8. auddie dit :

    I work at night at Kraftwek Berlin, where 3 months agao Atonal festival is yearly transforming dance music into an arythmic alternative. I built stages, stands, massive decoration for a YouTube fair ; no joke. I’m not proud about it. It’s just to make money and I already wrote so much about this night/day effect, work/party, surface/underground, present/past, that emerge from the same distorded places.

    I hesitate to bring a camera, secretely set behind a wall, to make 100% stage-builder-selfies with my driller in a hand and my helmet in the other one ; or maybe a sandwich ?
    My chief could pop up and say : “you’re not here to make art, you’re fired”. And I’ll surely scream : “Get the fuck out of my frame, I’m working”. Whatever he’ll say… the world has to know that I became very accurate to write at work, or to make field recording in the halls, payed, and safe. (blink)

    I already wrote a book about the forgotten proletarian roots of our music. What can I do next ? Feeling more in Manchester, in Belgium or in Detroit in 1985, than in Berlin in 2017 ?

    Does it have a sens ? Maybe tonight more than ever.
    . (field rec and voices cut ups from the proletarian Berlin halls)
    : : ( for the frenchies, the book is still available. 270 pages. fiction PM me ) : :

  9. Brieuc Le Meur (auddie) ^ a photo analysis dit :

    The audist says :

    We look at a photography : in the forefront, an enlighted young naked tree.
    In the backgroungd : some modern empty architect appartements from the east-side Berlin. It’s calm. This is the night.
    The whole art work inspires tension, fear, but also, ulta sharpness.
    It looks like a failed photo. Under the building, some warm colours in transparency are suggesting an other world, the world of the cars, out of the range of perception. A hope, maybe.
    It’s like, the artist is trying to hide something
    or, does he reveal that OuR core is hidden behind tons of fakery ?
    A certain ratio of violence is there, no doubt about it. But wich one? Even comfort zones are hiding a violence. European sweet life styles can hide colonialism, wars, or the organised theft of resources in Africa.
    The front subject, a banal fence surrounded by wild plants, a monodirectional gonzo light, and the sad and cold background, are dialoguing. This dialog reflects the violence.
    No crazyness here. It’s not even trying to “blow the whistle”. ( ” M ” , Fritz Lang).
    It is an enlighted young naked tree
    stroked, by a red flashing spektrum on the left side
    visited by some kind of artefact, a small detail,
    something …

    The artist says :

    A slight self is hiding sub pulsions
    what you see is what you get
    between the lines : a thriller driller ( me and my camera )

Laisser un commentaire

Votre adresse de messagerie ne sera pas publiée.

Captcha Captcha Reload

Vous pouvez utiliser ces balises et attributs HTML : <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>